For authors
Read the rubric first.
These are the six questions reviewers answer. If one exposes a gap, revise before you send the paper.
Read the rubricSubmissions are open for Volume 01
View submission guideAuthor toolkit
A free checklist for student researchers, teachers, and program leaders. Use it to find the weak spots before you upload.
A six-part self-check
Run through this list once the draft is complete. It works for humanities, social-science, and STEM work from a class, capstone, research program, or independent project.
State a question or thesis that a reader can test, follow, or challenge.
Use a consistent citation style or data record and make it possible for a reader to locate the evidence behind every major claim.
Explain what your evidence can and cannot establish. A limitation is part of a credible argument.
Remove your name, school, acknowledgments, and identifying file metadata before upload.
Briefly explain material AI, mentor, editing, translation, coding, or data-analysis help.
Before submitting, ask one careful reader where the argument is least clear and revise with a point-by-point plan.
For authors
These are the six questions reviewers answer. If one exposes a gap, revise before you send the paper.
Read the rubricFor teachers & programs
Share the checklist, support revision, and let each student decide whether Open Margin fits. Editorial decisions stay independent.
Explore partnershipsFor contributors
We recruit reviewers and advisors who can make comments specific, confidential, and fair.
Review with usWhen the draft is ready
Blind the file, check the sources, explain the limits, and make sure you are ready to hear what another reader sees.